We are grateful to the jury for their careful consideration of the facts in this case. This is the second mistrial as a result of a hung jury on this plaintiff’s case and follows two recent verdicts finding in favor of Johnson & Johnson. We believe these outcomes reflect the diligent review by these juries of the real facts in these cases, despite Plaintiff Trial Attorneys’ tactics to confuse the science with misleading interpretations of evidence.
We look forward to a new trial to present our defense, which rests on decades of independent, non-litigation driven scientific evaluations, none of which have found that Johnson’s Baby Powder contains asbestos.